Tuesday, February 23, 2021

Tips for Calling Your Florida Representative or Florida Senator

 Tips for calling your Florida Representative or Florida Senator: 

  • If you live in their district, be sure to let them know.  Your representatives* always want to hear from constituents.**
  • Call anytime.  Voicemails are okay, even if you don’t speak to someone.  Just be sure to modify the call script to make more sense for a voicemail instead of a live call.
  • Be kind and respectful.  Some Senators and Representatives will already be on our side.  You may also speak with an intern or staff member who’s just doing their job.  Smile when you dial!
  • Practice what you’ll say before dialing so your point comes across clearly and confidently.
  • Be concise.  If you don’t use the suggested scripts, just make sure you reiterate the singular ask of the person you're calling at least twice.  For example, say "please vote no on House Bill 1" at least twice during your call or your voicemail message.
  • Make your calls timely.  Your fellow volunteer leaders and staff members will try our best to make sure your calls are made at the most effective moment.  Follow instructions on when and whom to call.

 Did You Know. . . 

Most advocacy or policy calls take less than 2 minutes?  It's a very low time commitment but still the most effective way to communicate with your representatives!

 Who do I call? 

Sierra Club volunteer leaders and staff will often let you know whom to call, so be sure to stick with that guidance.  But if you need to find your state/Florida and federal/US representatives, you can use this link: www.myfloridahouse.gov/FindYourRepresentative


 What's All This Mean, Anyway? 

*representative = This can be confusing!  If you see "representative," with a small "r," that is a generic term for anyone who represents you at any level of government.  If you see "Representative" with a big "R," that is an official title of an elected official, such as Representative Gonzalez, and it can mean someone at the federal (US) or state (Florida) levels.  When we say representative (small r), we are often talking about both Representatives and Senators in a generic sense, but it can also encompass Mayors, County Commissioners, and other elected officials.

Another layer of potential confusion?  When we use "representative" or "Representative" in the shorthand it can look like "rep." or "Rep."  Sometimes "Rep." can also be used to indicate the Republican political party.  It's best to double-check someone's intent when using the shorthand "Rep." to avoid confusion.

**Constituent = "a member of a constituency; a component part of something."  For our purposes, a constituent is a person who lives in a district represented by an individual.  You are a constituent of multiple people at multiple levels of government, including federal, state, county, and city.

Thursday, February 18, 2021

FDACS PHASE 2 BURNING RULES ARE ALL SMOKE AND MIRRORS

November 2020 sugar field burn South Bay FL


For Immediate Release                                                                   

February 18, 2021

ContactsSteve Messam, smessam@me.com, 989-400-4225

Fred Brockman, fbrock@att.net 


 **PRESS RELEASE**


FDACS PHASE 2 BURNING RULES ARE ALL 

SMOKE AND MIRRORS


BELLE GLADE -- On January 1, 2021, the second phase of Commissioner of Agriculture Nikki Fried’s “improvements” to the rules that determine when and why pre-harvest sugarcane field burning can be permitted went into effect.  The failure of these “improvements” to make any difference to the residents in the Glades, and the renewed call for a phase-out of pre-harvest sugarcane field burning, were addressed in a letter sent to Commissioner Fried on February 3, 2021 by community activists in and around the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA):


February 3, 2021


Commissioner Nikki Fried 

Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 

Plaza Level 10, The Capitol 

400 S. Monroe St. 

Tallahassee, FL 32399-080 

RE: Stop The Burn 

As of January 1, 2021, the “phase 2” pre-harvest sugar field burning rule changes you announced on August 4, 2020, became effective. While the details of “phase 2” were not made easily available to the public between August and January, we requested those details via public records request on August 6, 2020, and received those details on January 7, 2021. After now having the benefit of reviewing the received documents, and experiencing firsthand the insignificance of these changes on the quality of life in our communities, we bring the following to your attention: 

  • Sugarcane field pre-harvest burn permits are denied when wind blows in excess of 10 MPH in Zone 2 North and 12 MPH in Zone 2 South towards Eastern Palm Beach County and Eastern Martin County while sugarcane field pre-harvest burn permits are approved when wind blows in excess of 12 MPH in Zone 4 and 15 MPH in Zone 5 towards the Glades, as long as backing fires are used. 

  • Backing fires are required for all burns when winds speeds are below 10 MPH in Zone 2 North and 12 MPH in Zone 2 South towards the East while backfires are only required when wind speeds exceed 12 MPH in Zone 4 and 15 MPH in Zone 5 when towards the Glades communities. 

  • Wellington had a population of 23,309 in 1992 when resident complaints led to the development of wind-based regulations to increase protection for their communities.The Glades region now has a population of roughly 55,833 residents and yet the residents there remain without equal protection making referenced “improvements” related to population growth nothing but smoke and mirrors. 

  • The Florida Certified Prescribed Burn Manager Training Course for EAA burners, whether or not changes were made with regard to who is trained when, has no impact on the number, intensity, or proximity of pre-harvest burns in and around the Glades. 

The “Phase 2” changes have brought no positive impact on our quality of life, no noticeable difference in the amount of smoke and ash falling on our homes and schools, and no relief from the damper falling ash has on our economic landscape. These changes have done nothing to address the historic stark, Black and White differences between how communities in Eastern Palm Beach County and the Glades have been treated by FDACS. 

The newly implemented changes do not expand the circumstances where permits blowing toxic smoke and ash toward the Glades communities would be denied, rather they only expand the circumstances where backfires must be used. What is especially cruel about this change is that backfires used on the organic muck soils prevalent in the EAA can increase the likelihood of smoldering or “muck fires.” Muck fires can increase ground-level CO and ozone production

adding further health threats to surrounding communities. To add insult to injury, these muck fires further erode and degrade the vulnerable muck soils of the EAA. See here and here.

Therefore, our review and experience throw a harsh revelatory light on your remarks of August 4, 2020, when you stated: “This second phase of prescribed burning improvements delivers on our promise to enhance public safety, reduce smoke and ash impacts for Everglades communities, and reduce the risk of wildfires.” The fact is that they do nothing of the sort. 

Fourteen months have passed without any action on your part in response to our community’s urgent plea for a burn-free buffer zone around our homes, schools, churches and businesses. Nearly a year has passed since that plea was made even more urgent by the added threat of COVID-19 to an already vulnerable population, a point made clear to you in 2020 by the medical professionals represented by the Florida Clinicians for Climate Action (FCCA), Florida Physicians for Social Responsibility (FLPSR), and Florida Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (FLAAP). 

It is clear that protection of communities in Eastern Palm Beach and Martin Counties remains your priority while the people of the Glades are sacrificable. The environmental racism at the core of your predecessors’ response to pre-harvest burning is still at the core of yours. 

The past two years of inaction or meaningless action beg a number of important questions: 

  • If population density is a determining factor in who gets and does not get protection under the wind direction rules, how does FDACS reconcile the fact that the Glades region has for sometime had a population over twice that of 1992 Wellington? 

  • What steps have been taken to promote a switch to green harvesting by FDACS since the August 4, 2020 press release that stated: “Commissioner Fried also continues to encourage adoption of green harvesting by working with corporate partners on the manufacturing and purchasing of sugarcane biomass?” 

  • The Florida Certified Prescribed Burn Manager Training Course appears to have remained unchanged since 2014, and only references pre-harvest sugarcane burning once in passing. What if anything has changed within the Florida Certified Prescribed burn Course or training protocols or requirements that warranted mention within the “phase 2” changes? 

As constituents who are especially impacted by your administration’s policies on sugarcane burning, we expect to receive a response. We know you have interacted with groups associated with and representing the interests of the sugar industry, and so request the same attention and respect. To refuse to respond to the call for a no-burn buffer between our families and the toxic smoke and ash is unconscionable. 

We applaud the stated goals included in your "Federal Partnership Plan" announced on February 2. We urge you to (1) make the obvious connections between “regenerative

agriculture,” “biomass-based renewable fuels,” “climate change mitigation,” and “environmental justice” and the switch to green harvesting; and (2) take immediate action to meet those goals for the benefit of our community members. 

We implore you to acknowledge the environmental racism that is within your power to address and take immediate action to end it. 

Sincerely, 

Stop The Burn Leadership Team: 

Fred Brockman 

Sister Laura Cavanaugh 

June Downs 

Anne Haskell 

Brittany Ingram 

Elaine Lavallee 

Catherine Martinez 

Steve Messam 

Elena Michel 

Robert Mitchell 

Kina Phillips 

Shanique Scott 

Kathey Sullivan 

Richard Sullivan 

Colin Walkes

………………………………………………………………………………………………..

“You would think that during a pandemic our communities could be given basic courtesy so we wouldn’t have to call and complain to the Florida Forest Service about the sugarcane burns choking our city.  Commissioner Fried where are you?  You have the authority to stop this.  Why are we being ignored?” stated Robert Mitchell, Belle Glade resident and founder of Muck City Black Lives Matter.


Sister Laura, Belle Glade resident, said:  "There have been days this past month where the smoke has been so overwhelming that closing my windows has brought no reprieve from the stench of sugarcane burning.  If Commissioner Fried got a chance to hear from us, or spend any amount of time in the Glades during the harvesting season, I doubt she would continue to claim how ‘substantial’ her Phase 2 rule improvements really are."


Background:



####


Wednesday, February 10, 2021

Act Now for Environmental Justice: “Farming Operations”

  Use your voice!

Call the Florida Senators below before Monday.



<<alt text: two square graphics, one with burning sugarcane field in the background and text stating action alert, bad bill alert, sb88 farming operations, with sierra club logo, the other graphic states make calls for environmental justice, tell these senators to vote no on sb88, and lists senators’ names and phone numbers, which are also listed below in text>>



What to say when you call:


“Hello!  My name is ______.  I’m calling to ask Senator _____ to vote NO on Senate Bill 88 during the Environment and Natural Resource Committee hearing on Monday.


Everyone deserves an even playing field when it comes to our justice system.  SB 88 would greatly reduce our ability to hold agricultural industry defendants accountable by favoring them above plaintiffs and other businesses.  This bad bill clearly picks winners and losers, and that’s just not fair to Floridians.


Please vote NO on SB 88.  Thank you!”



Call these Florida Senators before Monday:

(it’s okay to leave a voicemail, or to send an email if calling isn’t an option; do not forward this email to senators or representatives, instead, write a new email to them)


Senator Bean - (850) 487-5004 - bean.aaron@flsenate.gov

(his district includes Nassau and Duval Counties, let him know if you live in the area)


Senator Perry - (850) 487-5008 - perry.keith@flsenate.gov

(his district includes central portions of north Florida, let him know if you live in the area)


Senator Ausley - (850) 487-5003 - ausley.loranne@flsenate.gov

(her district covers portions of the Panhandle, let her know if you live in the area)


Senator Stewart - (850) 487-5013 - stewart.linda@flsenate.gov

(her district covers a portion of Orange County, let her know if you live in the area)



<<alt text:black  graphic with white text states share this action alert on your social media to reach even more people, includes instructions for saving graphics and posting on social media platforms>>




Tips for calling:

  • If you live in the Senator’s district, be sure to let them know.  They always want to hear from constituents.

  • Call anytime.  Voicemails are okay, even if you don’t speak to someone.

  • Be kind and respectful.  Some senators and representatives will already be on our side.  You may also speak with an intern or staff member who’s just doing their job.

  • Practice what you’ll say before dialing so your point comes across clearly and confidently.

  • Be concise.  If you don’t use the suggested scripts, just make sure you say “Vote NO on SB 88” at least twice.

 


 

If you want more info, dive in!  Remember, you don’t need to be an expert in order to take action.  Making the phone call is the most important part.

 

The Problems with SB 88:

  • SB 88 sets up an uneven playing field between potential plaintiffs and farm operation defendants.

  • Floridians deserve the right to seek redress through our justice system without legislation that pre-determines winners and losers.

  • This bill will make it difficult or impossible for residents currently subjected to 8 months of smoke and ash from sugar burning each year to successfully sue for damages.

  • If adopted, this bill may interfere with an ongoing suit.

  • SB 88 unreasonably limits “standing” (the ability to sue).

  • This bill favors farm operations above other everyday Floridians and businesses.


More background information on this issue:

  • Makes plaintiffs risk responsibility for the legal fees of farm operation defendants

    • Everyday Floridians with legitimate complaints are far less likely to seek and receive justice due to the enormous potential liability

    • This is a deliberate tactic to dissuade suits from being filed

  • Stretches the “coming to the nuisance” argument

    • “Right to Farm” laws protect farm operations from suits filed by newcomers who move to a farming area and complain about noise and smells on the grounds that they chose to “come to the nuisance”

    • SB 88 stretches that argument to extend protection to suits having nothing to do with newcomers moving in, such as negligence, personal injury, and defective product liability. No one chooses to “come to negligence.”

  • Creates a much steeper burden of proof for plaintiffs with legitimate injuries

    • Applies only to farm operations

  • Removes plaintiffs’ ability to seek health impact damages in court

    • Limits damage award to no more than the amount of reduction in value of a plaintiff’s property, even if their injury is entirely unrelated to that property

  • Eliminates the court’s ability to factor in the most recent 3 years of damages prior to the initiation of a suit

    • The court may only factor in damages/injuries incurred more than 3 years before the date a suit is initiated, meaning a farm operation defendant’s recent past actions cannot be considered in a punitive damages award 

  • Eliminates the rights of plaintiffs living more than 2,640 feet, ½ mile, from a farm operations defendant to address issues in court

    • Constituents that live 2,640 feet from a potential defendant have their rights removed (that’s the distance from the Capitol complex to Tennessee Street)

    • Water, air, noise, and light pollution can and do occur at much greater distances than ½ miles


###